Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

An Analysis of Rhetorical Structures of Introduction Sections in International Conference Papers

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 234–251

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i2.56500
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2022-06-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Producing a well-organized and coherent text remains a significant problem in EFL context writing. Cognitive demands and low exposure to the language contribute to this issue. Numerous researches are available to tackle EFL learners’ texts by using various ways such as Theme/Rheme and thematic progression. Some studies attempt to uncover EFL texts’ coherence by using rhetorical moves and structure. This study attempted a novel method to reveal text coherence called Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) by Mann and Thompson (1988). The data were the introduction sections of ten articles taken from the International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology (ISET) 2019, and they were analyzed by considering 23 relations in RST. The findings reveal that the Subject Matter relations category overpowers the number of Presentational relations. Elaboration ranks at the top with 72 data, followed by Background (19 times) and Purpose (18 times). However, there is no datum for Volitional Result, Otherwise, Interpretation, and Sequence relations. It suggests that the article writers preferred to provide information by giving a detailed explanation, a background of the case, and the study purposes. The results are expected to encourage future researchers to utilize various ways of tackling text coherence and to provide an alternative to analyzing text for educators.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 142 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui12
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti HerlindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aunur RofiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tien RafidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rusydi AnandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Erise AnggrainiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Chandra IrsanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Harman HamidsonAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rosnawintang RosnawintangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AzisahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lina ardiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini MaulidhawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januarius MujiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dery Tria AgustinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">An Analysis of Rhetorical Structures of Introduction Sections in International Conference Papers</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sulistyani, Diyana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suwandi, Suwandi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Producing a well-organized and coherent text remains a significant problem in EFL context writing. Cognitive demands and low exposure to the language contribute to this issue. Numerous researches are available to tackle EFL learners’ texts by using various ways such as Theme/Rheme and thematic progression. Some studies attempt to uncover EFL texts’ coherence by using rhetorical moves and structure. This study attempted a novel method to reveal text coherence called Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) by Mann and Thompson (1988). The data were the introduction sections of ten articles taken from the International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology (ISET) 2019, and they were analyzed by considering 23 relations in RST. The findings reveal that the Subject Matter relations category overpowers the number of Presentational relations. Elaboration ranks at the top with 72 data, followed by Background (19 times) and Purpose (18 times). However, there is no datum for Volitional Result, Otherwise, Interpretation, and Sequence relations. It suggests that the article writers preferred to provide information by giving a detailed explanation, a background of the case, and the study purposes. The results are expected to encourage future researchers to utilize various ways of tackling text coherence and to provide an alternative to analyzing text for educators.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/56500</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i2.56500</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 2 (2022): June 2022; 234-251</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/56500/21894</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>