Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Comparison of Positive Politeness Strategies by Ellen to Interact with Her Guests of Age Groups

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 280–289

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.72138
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2023-06-20
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Politeness cannot be achieved directly when people are born because of genetic factors or special characteristics given by God. It needs to be learned, and they should consider whom they speak to establish a good relationship between the speaker (S) and hearer (H) in the social interaction. This study aims to explain the similarities and differences between the use of positive politeness strategies by Ellen in her interaction with adult and young guests. The transcript of Ellen’s talk show becomes the primary source of this study where the data were analyzed by using Brown and Levinson’s theory. This study was descriptive qualitative research with a pragmatic approach. Based on the data analysis, Ellen applied noticing, exaggerating, and intensifying interest to H, using in-group identity markers, seeking agreement, asserting common ground, being optimistic, including S and H in the activity, and giving gifts in her communication with adult and young guests. The strategy of using in-group identity markers is frequently used in Ellen’s interaction with a percentage of 27,8%. In addition, in Ellen’s interaction with the young guests, the noticing strategy is the most dominant strategy with a percentage of 25%. The strategies of avoiding disagreement, joking, promising, and giving reasons were only applied in her interaction with the adult guests. Therefore, Ellen’s decision to use these positive politeness strategies can save the hearers’ positive face and maintain the relationship among them. As a result, this study contributes to English language teaching in class interaction, especially in fulfilling the students’ positive face.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 123 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putri AnggraeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Qonita Nowindra RamadhaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anabela Romaito PangaribuanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lina ardiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Warsono -Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dery Tria AgustinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika MirantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdelbaset Mohamed WajejAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Retno ApriliyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nanda LahitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanhan LovihandrieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muh Imam ShofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ivvon Septina BellaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Debby MulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Musmuliadi MusmuliadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Putri HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparison of Positive Politeness Strategies by Ellen to Interact with Her Guests of Age Groups</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Maula, Yuliana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Joko Yulianto, Henrikus</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Politeness cannot be achieved directly when people are born because of genetic factors or special characteristics given by God. It needs to be learned, and they should consider whom they speak to establish a good relationship between the speaker (S) and hearer (H) in the social interaction. This study aims to explain the similarities and differences between the use of positive politeness strategies by Ellen in her interaction with adult and young guests. The transcript of Ellen’s talk show becomes the primary source of this study where the data were analyzed by using Brown and Levinson’s theory. This study was descriptive qualitative research with a pragmatic approach. Based on the data analysis, Ellen applied noticing, exaggerating, and intensifying interest to H, using in-group identity markers, seeking agreement, asserting common ground, being optimistic, including S and H in the activity, and giving gifts in her communication with adult and young guests. The strategy of using in-group identity markers is frequently used in Ellen’s interaction with a percentage of 27,8%. In addition, in Ellen’s interaction with the young guests, the noticing strategy is the most dominant strategy with a percentage of 25%. The strategies of avoiding disagreement, joking, promising, and giving reasons were only applied in her interaction with the adult guests. Therefore, Ellen’s decision to use these positive politeness strategies can save the hearers’ positive face and maintain the relationship among them. As a result, this study contributes to English language teaching in class interaction, especially in fulfilling the students’ positive face.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72138</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.72138</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 280-289</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72138/25544</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>