Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effectiveness of PQ4R Learning Method in Ecosystem Materials To Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Reading Skills

Journal of Innovative Science Education · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 118–125

DOI
10.15294/jise.v8i1.14431
ISSN
2502-4523, 2252-6412
Terbit
2020-04-06
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the PQ4R learning method on learning outcomes of students' knowledge and reading skills. The design in this study used posttest only control group with 2 classes taking techniques. Class X-1 as a control class and X-2 as an experimental class using the PQ4R learning method. Data analysis techniques used descriptive analysis to determine the completeness of the learning outcomes of the experimental class. Test the improvement of student learning outcomes with N-gain values. Comparative hypothesis testing with paired t-test samples and reading skills with a questionnaire and observation. The results of students' mastery learning showed that only 10 students out of 35 students reached KKM. Tests for improving student learning outcomes indicate a medium category. The comparative hypothesis test shows the asymp.sig value of 0.001, which means that there are differences in the learning outcomes of the control class and the experimental class. And students' reading skills show the distribution of questionnaires that agree and the observation sheets are categorized as good. The conclusion of this study is that the PQ4R learning method is better than the class that does not use the PQ4R learning method on student learning outcomes and reading skills on ecosystem material.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 114 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Amin RetnoningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang3
Ely RudyatmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri NgabektiState University of Semarang2
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Kartono KartonoState University of Semarang2
Endang SusiloningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yusuf Zakarias ManutedeAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang2
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi PurwantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mohammad AkhlasAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang2
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwita TrianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Siti Harnina BintariState University of Semarang2
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang2
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang2
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoState University of Semarang2
Dyah Rini IndriyantiState University of Semarang2
Suharto LinuwihmoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anindita Firdatul JannahState University of Semarang2
Ning SetiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang2
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang2
Sony ZulfikasariState University of Semarang1
Devi Ajeng EfriliandaState University of Semarang1
RodiyahState University of Semarang1
Kien Tsong ChauUniversiti Sains Malaysia1
Lutfia Nur HadiyantiState University of Semarang1
H. MarinaState University of Semarang1
Dian SapitriState University of Semarang1
Ratna Dewi PuspitasariState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of  PQ4R Learning Method in Ecosystem Materials To Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Reading Skills</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dzulhikam, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ridlo, Saiful</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kusuma Dewi, Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the PQ4R learning method on learning outcomes of students' knowledge and reading skills. The design in this study used posttest only control group with 2 classes taking techniques. Class X-1 as a control class and X-2 as an experimental class using the PQ4R learning method. Data analysis techniques used descriptive analysis to determine the completeness of the learning outcomes of the experimental class. Test the improvement of student learning outcomes with N-gain values. Comparative hypothesis testing with paired t-test samples and reading skills with a questionnaire and observation. The results of students' mastery learning showed that only 10 students out of 35 students reached KKM. Tests for improving student learning outcomes indicate a medium category. The comparative hypothesis test shows the asymp.sig value of 0.001, which means that there are differences in the learning outcomes of the control class and the experimental class. And students' reading skills show the distribution of questionnaires that agree and the observation sheets are categorized as good. The conclusion of this study is that the PQ4R learning method is better than the class that does not use the PQ4R learning method on student learning outcomes and reading skills on ecosystem material.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-04-06</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/14431</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jise.v8i1.14431</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Innovative Science Education; Vol 9 No 1 (2020): April 2020; 118 - 125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4523</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6412</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jise.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/14431/13982</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Innovative Science Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>