Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Realization of Communication Tasks in Negotiating Meaning among EFL learners

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 76–84

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.33854
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2020-03-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

People currently live at a time where the ability to speak English fluently has become a must for those who attempt to advance in certain fields. In classroom context however communication task is considered as a crucial element of English language teaching. As a strategy of communication, negotiation of meaning plays as a process through which the speakers go to clearly comprehend one another. The aims of this study are to analyze the realization of different communication tasks in negotiating meaning and to dig up those tasks in order to explain its impact on negotiation of meaning. A qualitative method is applied in this study where twenty undergraduate students majoring in English Language Education took part in it. The students were paired and assigned to perform five different communication tasks. The result showed that communication tasks had been effectively used as an opportunity for students to elicit the occurrences of negotiation of meaning in interactions. Moreover, it was discovered that each task type yielded different amount of negotiation. Information gap task came out as the most productive task in promoting negotiation of meaning among the other four with some negotiation of meaning strategies employed by students during negotiation; clarification request, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. In conclusion, engaging students in such communication tasks leading to negotiating meaning helps them in developing their linguistic acknowledgement. It is due to the frequent use of negotiation of meaning strategies can contribute to language development of EFL learners in all level of proficiency.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 157 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa ShakiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Frimadhona SyafriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zumala HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini Susanti WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hanum BestariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Banggala Puja SenaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prima PuspitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Farid AbdillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Communication Tasks in Negotiating Meaning among EFL learners</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rachma, Nita Sitta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">People currently live at a time where the ability to speak English fluently has become a must for those who attempt to advance in certain fields. In classroom context however communication task is considered as a crucial element of English language teaching. As a strategy of communication, negotiation of meaning plays as a process through which the speakers go to clearly comprehend one another. The aims of this study are to analyze &amp;nbsp;the realization of different communication tasks in negotiating meaning and to dig up those tasks in order to explain its impact on negotiation of meaning. A qualitative method is applied in this study where twenty &amp;nbsp;undergraduate &amp;nbsp;students &amp;nbsp;majoring in&amp;nbsp; English Language Education took part in it. The students were paired and assigned to perform five different communication tasks. The result showed that communication tasks had been effectively used as an opportunity for students to elicit the occurrences of negotiation of meaning in interactions. Moreover, it was discovered that each task type yielded different amount of negotiation. Information gap task came out as the most productive task in promoting negotiation of meaning among the other four with some negotiation of meaning strategies employed by students during negotiation; clarification request, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. In conclusion, engaging students in such communication tasks leading to negotiating meaning helps them in developing their linguistic acknowledgement. It is due to the frequent use of negotiation of meaning strategies can contribute to language development of EFL learners in all level of proficiency.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/33854</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.33854</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 1 (2020): March 2020; 76-84</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/33854/14191</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>