Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Evaluating the Validity, Reliability and Authenticity of English Achievement Test for the Twelfth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi

English Education Journal · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 130–138

DOI
10.15294/eej.v11i1.44176
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2021-03-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to investigate the implementation of the English achievement test for the twelfth-grade students at SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi in the academic year 2019/2020. This study was a contenr analyis. The objects of this study were English achievement test items. It consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions and 5 essay questions. The data collection method was a document analysis checklist. In this study, the researcher analyzed the data from English achievement test for validity aspects such as content validity and construct validity, the degree of reliability, and the implementation of language authenticity criteria. The findings of this study revealed that; (1) the content validity shows 76% valid, and the construct validity shows 60% valid; (2) the reliability shows coefficient 0.281 for multiple-choice items and 0,554 for essay items, and it is reliable; (3) the results of analyzing the authenticity shows that the listening items, reading test and essay writing are authentic. However, each part has some weaknesses. Especially in the reading test, most of the passages use in reading tests failed to represent the world context even though the topics of the passages are rational and based on the real context. Nevertheless, the English teacher who constructed the English achievement test did not mention the sources from which the passages were taken. Next, the samples of the format letter, announcement, and pamphlet look unnatural view from the format and design. Moreover, the English Achievement Test for twelfth-grade students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi has fulfilled the characteristics of validity, reliability, and authenticity as a good test or standardized test.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 140 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Muhsin MuhsinAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hendi PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Farid SukmanaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Gresik2
Diana PurwitasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Satrio Hadi WijoyoUniversity of Brawijaya2
Septiyan Andika IsantaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang2
Niken SubektiState University of Semarang2
Heru SetyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sonika MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rifa’atunnisa Rifa’atunnisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Juhadi JuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zulfa ShakiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Joko WidodoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Heri YantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rusdarti RusdartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Chastine FatichahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Yufis AzharUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang1
Admaja Dwi HerlambangUniversity of Brawijaya1
Amelia WidihastutikAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yohana SetyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Atun Sri RejekiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulianti YuliantiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Baruna Rizky PerdanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluating the Validity, Reliability and Authenticity of English Achievement Test for the Twelfth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Winarti, Muncar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rozi, Fahrur</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to investigate the implementation of the English achievement test for the twelfth-grade students at SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi in the academic year 2019/2020. This study was a contenr analyis. The objects of this study were English achievement test items. It consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions and 5 essay questions. The data collection method was a document analysis checklist. In this study, the researcher analyzed the data from English achievement test for validity aspects such as content validity and construct validity, the degree of reliability, and the implementation of language authenticity criteria. The findings of this study revealed that; (1) the content validity shows 76% valid, and the construct validity shows 60% valid; (2) the reliability shows coefficient 0.281 for multiple-choice items and 0,554 for essay items, and it is reliable; (3) the results of analyzing the authenticity shows that the listening items, reading test and essay writing are authentic. However, each part has some weaknesses. Especially in the reading test, most of the passages use in reading tests failed to represent the world context even though the topics of the passages are rational and based on the real context. Nevertheless, the English teacher who constructed the English achievement test did not mention the sources from which the passages were taken. Next, the samples of the format letter, announcement, and pamphlet look unnatural view from the format and design. Moreover, the English Achievement Test for twelfth-grade students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi has fulfilled the characteristics of validity, reliability, and authenticity as a good test or standardized test.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/44176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v11i1.44176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 11 No 1 (2021): March 2021; 130-138</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v11i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/44176/18022</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>