Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019) · hlm. 39–47

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Terbit
2019-07-28
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score > 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values > 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item > 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783> 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 193 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 8 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang9
Scolastika MarianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Hartono HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Supriyadi SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Iwan JunaediAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Tri Sri Noor AsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Kristina WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang4
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Sunarto SunartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Totok SumaryantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwijanto DwijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zaenuri MasturAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Isti HidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Walid WalidState University of Semarang3
Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ami AriyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rahayu Budhiati VeronicaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Fuadi -Afiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar2
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suhito SuhitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Stevanus Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Endang Retno WinartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prihatina HikmasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Safira Aprillia NarumiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Lukky FadillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ana RisdiantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Uzlifa Khanifatul MuttaqiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ignasia Santi Kumala SwariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hakim, M. Ikhwanul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lestari, Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score &amp;gt; 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values &amp;gt; 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item &amp;gt; 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 &amp;lt; 0.06, and the GFI value = 0.932 &amp;gt; 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d &amp;lt; 0.4 and the remaining 10 items were received without revision with d &amp;gt; 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783&amp;gt; 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/31551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 1 (2019); 39-47</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/31551/13770</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>