Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

HOTS of VIII class students reviewed from creative thinking process of the Osborn model in PjBL

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 79–84

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v10i1.42834
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Terbit
2021-03-31
Penerbit
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The aim of this study was to find out how the effectiveness of PjBL towards students' HOTS and to find out how the HOTS process of students in terms of the Osborn Model thinking process. This study uses mixed methods using a pre-experimental research design that is used is the one-shot case study using a sequential explanatory strategy. The population used in this study were all 8th-grade students at one junior high school in Semarang in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 school year. The research subjects were students of class 8A in a Junior High School in Semarang. Methods of data collection were carried out using tests, interviews, and observations. The results of the quantitative research showed that the ability of students in the HOTS aspect who received PjBL learning did not achieve actual passing grade. It can be concluded that the project-based learning model is not effective against students' HOTS. The results of the qualitative research indicate that there are descriptions of the HOTS process at various levels of analysis and evaluation. The diversity of HOTS process descriptions is shown in the fact-finding idea-making stage, some subjects who can achieve the evaluation level and get high scores to choose then write down information to solve the problem. In the idea-generating stage, subjects who have reached the evaluation level in HOTS tend to do one thing to find ideas, read repeatedly to find ideas and do not move to other problems if they don't find ideas. In the idea evaluation stage, the subject with the level of analysis does not check the complete results. the subject with the level of evaluation checks all the results of completion or some of the results of completion, some students pay attention to writing the results of the completion so that it is easy to understand.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 122 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Primagraha
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang5
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga5
St. Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang3
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Adi Satrio ArdiansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amin SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Batul Fatin HendrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Lathifatun Ni’mahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Sugiarto _Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Supriyadi SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika Silfiana A.KhAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang WerdiningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu Eka Putra MuttaqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ninik SetiyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fauzi FadliansyahUniversitas Primagraha1
Joko SutartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ginanjar MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul KadirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Bambang SubaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Mafaza A’laAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitrania AinurrachmaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iqbal KharisudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sanianajiba Nugroho PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ary Woro KurniasihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlalili Tri RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhidik Joko PurnomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tuti HaryatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Desy KumalasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">HOTS of VIII class students reviewed from creative thinking process of the Osborn model in PjBL</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mujinuranto, Bagas</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Junaedi, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The aim of this study was to find out how the effectiveness of PjBL towards students' HOTS and to find out how the HOTS process of students in terms of the Osborn Model thinking process. This study uses mixed methods using a pre-experimental research design that is used is the one-shot case study using a sequential explanatory strategy. The population used in this study were all 8th-grade students at one junior high school in Semarang in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 school year. The research subjects were students of class 8A in a Junior High School in Semarang. Methods of data collection were carried out using tests, interviews, and observations. The results of the quantitative research showed that the ability of students in the HOTS aspect who received PjBL learning did not achieve actual passing grade. It can be concluded that the project-based learning model is not effective against students' HOTS. The results of the qualitative research indicate that there are descriptions of the HOTS process at various levels of analysis and evaluation. The diversity of HOTS process descriptions is shown in the fact-finding idea-making stage, some subjects who can achieve the evaluation level and get high scores to choose then write down information to solve the problem. In the idea-generating stage, subjects who have reached the evaluation level in HOTS tend to do one thing to find ideas, read repeatedly to find ideas and do not move to other problems if they don't find ideas. In the idea evaluation stage, the subject with the level of analysis does not check the complete results. the subject with the level of evaluation checks all the results of completion or some of the results of completion, some students pay attention to writing the results of the completion so that it is easy to understand.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-03-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/42834</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v10i1.42834</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 79-84</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/42834/20013</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>