Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Style of Students on Mind mapping Learning Model with Constructivism Approach

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 36–43

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Terbit
2020-06-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This purpose of this study was to know the quality of learning and mathematical literacy ability reviewed from the students’ cognitive style in learning by using Mind mapping Learning Model with Constructivism approach. The method in this study used a mixed method with concurrent embedded design. This research conducted on VII grade students of SMP Negeri 40 Semarang in the academic year 2017/2018. To collecting data was done by tests, interviews, and observation sheets. The quality of learning reviwed by few stages were planning, implementation and assessment. The result of test matematical literacy ability were analyzed by quantitatively with a mean test, classical completeness test, proportion difference test and mean difference test. Students were grouped based on their cognitive style characteristics consisting of field dependent and field independent which chose four students to be interviewed. The results of the study showed; (1) learning with mind mapping model with constructivism approachs on mathematical literacy ability is good qualified which were indicated by; (a) learning tools that have been compiled are valid, (b) the level of implementation in the learning process is a good category; and (c) the assessment of learning outcomes takes place effectively (2) The mathematical literacy ability with field dependent cognitive style were able to master four indicators from the six indicators of mathematical literacy abilities and the other two indicators include representation and reasoning and argumentation have been less able to be mastered. Students with a field independent cognitive style were able to master all indicators of mathematical literacy ability and did not have constraints on indicators.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 187 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga9
Isnaini RosyidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang6
Amin SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang6
Mukh DoyinAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sumartini SumartiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang4
Sugiman SugimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
U’um QomariyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mashuri MashuriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Novira Rahmadian MahendraAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dwijanto DwijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Zaenuri MasturAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Adi Satrio ArdiansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Heriyanto HeriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mahadi Dwi Mahadi Dwi HatmokoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Arief AgoestantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad KharisAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aisyah Fany AchmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ary Woro KurniasihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amidi AmidiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tri Sri Noor AsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Herlina Ulfa NingrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mukeriyanto MukeriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ignasia Santi Kumala SwariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nikmah NurvicalestiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhamad Nurul HudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
BERNIKA RAHMANIA NALURITAAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sunarmi SunarmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Style of Students on Mind mapping Learning Model with Constructivism Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hairunisah, Hairunisah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mulyono, Mulyono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Walid, Walid</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This purpose of this study was to know the quality of learning and mathematical literacy ability reviewed from the students’ cognitive style in learning by using Mind mapping Learning Model with Constructivism approach. The method in this study used a mixed method with concurrent embedded design. This research conducted on VII grade students of SMP Negeri 40 Semarang in the academic year 2017/2018. To collecting data was done by tests, interviews, and observation sheets. The quality of learning reviwed by few stages were planning, implementation and assessment. The result of test matematical literacy ability were analyzed by quantitatively with a mean test, classical completeness test, proportion difference test and mean difference test. Students were grouped based on their cognitive style characteristics consisting of field dependent and field independent which chose four students to be interviewed. The results of the study showed; (1) learning with mind mapping model with constructivism approachs on mathematical literacy ability is good qualified which were indicated by; (a) learning tools that have been compiled are valid, (b) the level of implementation in the learning process is a good category; and (c) the assessment of learning outcomes takes place effectively (2) The mathematical literacy ability with field dependent cognitive style were able to master four indicators from the six indicators of mathematical literacy abilities and the other two indicators include representation and reasoning and argumentation have been less able to be mastered. Students with a field independent cognitive style were able to master all indicators of mathematical literacy ability and did not have constraints on indicators.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-06-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/30452</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 9 No 1 (2020): June 2020; 36-43</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/30452/14575</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>