Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Development of Assessment Instruments The Learning Process Chemistry Based Scientific Approach to High School Students

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 31–39

DOI
10.15294/jere.v9i1.30361
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2020-03-31
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Instrument based assessment of the scientific approach is very important learning process developed to measure scientific students. The instrument is said to be good and true if valid criteria, the reliability, practical, and effective. This research aimed to know the instrument character, to get a valid and reliability instrument, to examme instrument practicality, and to test the instrument effectiveness level in measuring students scientific learning process. This research used a qualitative and quantitative and adapted the method of research and development Borg and Gall models. The content validity of the instrument was validated by experts. Assessment instruments were tested at 30 students (limited) and 100 students (broad). The validity of the instrument items were analyzed with the program SPSS 16.0 version and obtamed which representated 20 items every scientific learning indicators. Reliability were analyzed with the SPSS program 16.0 version and obtamed the reliability by value 0.908 (very high). The validity of the assessment instruments constructs were analyzed by using LISREL program 8.8. version and model compatibility fulfilled a good of fit criteria with the grade of value (0.6159), RMSEA (0.000), RMR (0.061), CFI (1.00), NFI (0.98), GFI (0.97), AGFI (0.93), NNFI (0.98), PNFI (0.74), and PGFI (0.81). The results of the value calculation of construct reliability was 0.95 and variance extracted value was to 0.54. Assessment instruments had practicality and effectiveness level with "very good" category based on the user's response.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 233 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Walisongo State Islamic University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown14
Sri HaryaniAffiliation unknown12
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang8
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang8
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang7
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown7
Kasmui KasmuiState University of Semarang6
Nanik WijayatiState University of Semarang6
Mulyono MulyonoAffiliation unknown6
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown6
Sri WardaniAffiliation unknown5
Iwan JunaediState University of Semarang5
Tri Sri Noor AsihAffiliation unknown5
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang5
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang4
Kristina WijayantiAffiliation unknown4
Harjito HarjitoAffiliation unknown4
Supartono SupartonoAffiliation unknown4
Jumaeri JumaeriAffiliation unknown4
Sri NurhayatiAffiliation unknown4
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang4
Agung Tri PrasetyaState University of Semarang4
Sri Susilogati SumartiState University of Semarang4
Isnarto IsnartoAffiliation unknown4
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang3
Edy CahyonoState University of Semarang3
Eko Budi SusatyoAffiliation unknown3
Triastuti SulistyaningsihAffiliation unknown3
Dwijanto DwijantoAffiliation unknown3
Zaenuri MasturAffiliation unknown3
Isti HidayahAffiliation unknown3
Walid WalidState University of Semarang3
Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown3
Ami AriyaniAffiliation unknown3
Achmad BinadjaAffiliation unknown3
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown3
Apriliana DrastisiantiWalisongo State Islamic University2

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Development of Assessment Instruments The Learning Process Chemistry Based Scientific Approach to High School Students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Yakin, Muh Ikhsanul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Susilaningsih, Endang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Instrument based assessment of the scientific approach is very important learning process developed to measure scientific students. The instrument is said to be good and true if valid criteria, the reliability, practical, and effective. This research aimed to know the instrument character, to get a valid and reliability instrument, to examme instrument practicality, and to test the instrument effectiveness level in measuring students scientific learning process. This research used a qualitative and quantitative and adapted the method of research and development Borg and Gall models. The content validity of the instrument was validated by experts. Assessment instruments were tested at 30 students (limited) and 100 students (broad). The validity of the instrument items were analyzed with the program SPSS 16.0 version and obtamed which representated 20 items every scientific learning indicators. Reliability were analyzed with the SPSS program 16.0 version and obtamed the reliability by value 0.908 (very high). The validity of the assessment instruments constructs were analyzed by using LISREL program 8.8. version and model compatibility fulfilled a good of fit criteria with the grade of value (0.6159), RMSEA (0.000), RMR (0.061), CFI (1.00), NFI (0.98), GFI (0.97), AGFI (0.93), NNFI (0.98), PNFI (0.74), and PGFI (0.81). The results of the value calculation of construct reliability was 0.95 and variance extracted value was to 0.54. Assessment instruments had practicality and effectiveness level with "very good" category based on the user's response.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-03-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/30361</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v9i1.30361</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 9 No 1 (2020); 31-39</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/30361/17052</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>