Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Paul-Elder Based Student Worksheet as an Evaluation Tool and Development of Critical Thinking Skills: an Experimental Study in High School

International Journal of Active Learning · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 104–113

ISSN
2528-505X
Terbit
2025-02-09
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Critical thinking skills are essential for addressing 21st-century challenges. In the field of education, learning systems are designed to enhance students' abilities to analyze information, evaluate arguments, and make well-reasoned decisions based on rational and logical thinking. This study aims to examine the differences in the application of Paul-Elder-based student worksheets (LKPD) in improving students' critical thinking skills. This research employed an experimental method, using a control group that received Problem-Based Learning (PBL) worksheets and an experimental group that received Paul-Elder-based worksheets as a special treatment. Critical thinking skills data were collected through pre-tests, post-tests, and student worksheets (LKPD). The results showed that the experimental group experienced a more significant improvement in critical thinking skills compared to the control group. The improvement pattern in the experimental group was more systematic, particularly in problem identification, information gathering, and concept comprehension. However, a decline was observed in the conclusion-drawing stage, indicating that students still struggled to formulate accurate conclusions. Meanwhile, in the control group, critical thinking skills developed but followed a less consistent pattern.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 218 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • University of Bremen
  • State University of Makassar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sudarmin SudarminAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Agung Tri PrasetyaState University of Semarang6
Sri Susilogati SumartiState University of Semarang6
Sri WardaniState University of Semarang5
Eko Budi SusatyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang5
Sri HaryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang4
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang4
Harjito HarjitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang3
Edy CahyonoState University of Semarang3
Winarni PratjojoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Harjono HarjonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nurwachid Budi SantosaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri MursitiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Jumaeri JumaeriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Cepi KurniawanState University of Semarang2
Agung Tri PrasetyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri NurhayatiState University of Semarang2
Siti Herlina DewiState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Firdaus ImaduddinUniversity of Bremen1
Ramlawati RamlawatiState University of Makassar1
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Dwi Norma GupitasariState University of Semarang1
S. SaptoriniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dyah Rini IndriyantiState University of Semarang1
Muzakki BashoriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Ayu PuspitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Imas IstianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novie Prasetyo UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad JaeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad BurhanudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eros Meiliana ShofaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhlisin MuhlisinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijal/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Paul-Elder Based Student Worksheet as an Evaluation Tool and Development of Critical Thinking Skills: an Experimental Study in High School</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggreani, Ina </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sumarni, Woro </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kadarwati, Sri </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Critical Thinking Skills, Paul-Elder Framework, Student Worksheet</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Critical thinking skills are essential for addressing 21st-century challenges. In the field of education, learning systems are designed to enhance students' abilities to analyze information, evaluate arguments, and make well-reasoned decisions based on rational and logical thinking. This study aims to examine the differences in the application of Paul-Elder-based student worksheets (LKPD) in improving students' critical thinking skills. This research employed an experimental method, using a control group that received Problem-Based Learning (PBL) worksheets and an experimental group that received Paul-Elder-based worksheets as a special treatment. Critical thinking skills data were collected through pre-tests, post-tests, and student worksheets (LKPD). The results showed that the experimental group experienced a more significant improvement in critical thinking skills compared to the control group. The improvement pattern in the experimental group was more systematic, particularly in problem identification, information gathering, and concept comprehension. However, a decline was observed in the conclusion-drawing stage, indicating that students still struggled to formulate accurate conclusions. Meanwhile, in the control group, critical thinking skills developed but followed a less consistent pattern.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-02-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijal/article/view/20808</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">International Journal of Active Learning; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): October 2024; 104-113</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-505X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijal/article/view/20808/2988</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Active Learning</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>