Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Mathematical Reasoning Based on Belief in PBL with Dyadic Interaction Approach

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 48–53

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Terbit
2018-07-27
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purposes of this research were (1) to describe the learning quality of PBL through dyadic interaction approach to mathematical reasoning ability of grade X students of IT Al Irsyad Purwokerto High School (2) to find pattern of students reasoning ability based on mathematical belief. This study uses a mixed method. Data analysis started from the analysis of test items. The analysis uses the prerequisite test and then hypothesis testing uses rara average (t-test), then the proportion of comparative tests (test-z) is to calculate the classical completeness. Further testing of determining the difference between the two classes uses different test average (t-test right side). Qualitative data analysis uses qualitative description. The results of quantitative research shows that learning class with PBL and dyadic interaction approach reached classical total 80%. The average difference test showed class’ results with PBL dyadic interaction approach better than a class activity with PBL. Subjects with very low belief can only fulfill 1 reasoning indicator well. Subjects with low belief can fulfill 3 reasoning indicators well and have not been able to fulfill 1 other indicator. Subjects with high belief can fulfill 4 indicators where 1 indicator is imperfect and subject with very high belief can fulfill all the indicators of reasoning well and complete.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 198 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui30
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga10
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang6
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
St. Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang5
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang3
Rahayu Budhiati VeronicaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Kristina WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Adi Satrio ArdiansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Amin SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Megita Dwi PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Arka YanitamaState University of Semarang2
Asep Purwo Yudi UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rossi Galih KesumaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Riyadi WidhiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Batul Fatin HendrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Arief AgoestantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Herlina Ulfa NingrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Novira Rahmadian MahendraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agustin ZakkiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sukestiyarno SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kartika Sari AsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Edy SoedjokoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nur Karomah DwidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ardhi PrabowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Isti HidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Lathifatun Ni’mahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Stevanus Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ngabiyanto NgabiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Reasoning Based on Belief in PBL with Dyadic Interaction Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kusumawardani, Dyah Retno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Isnarto, Isnarto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Junaedi, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purposes of this research were (1) to describe the learning quality of PBL through dyadic interaction approach to mathematical reasoning ability of grade X students of IT Al Irsyad Purwokerto High School (2) to find pattern of students reasoning ability based on mathematical belief. This study uses a mixed method. Data analysis started from the analysis of test items. The analysis uses the prerequisite test and then hypothesis testing uses rara average (t-test), then the proportion of comparative tests (test-z) is to calculate the classical completeness. Further testing of determining the difference between the two classes uses different test average (t-test right side). Qualitative data analysis uses qualitative description. The results of quantitative research shows that learning class with PBL and dyadic interaction approach reached classical total 80%. The average difference test showed class’ results with PBL dyadic interaction approach better than a class activity with PBL. Subjects with very low belief can only fulfill 1 reasoning indicator well. Subjects with low belief can fulfill 3 reasoning indicators well and have not been able to fulfill 1 other indicator. Subjects with high belief can fulfill 4 indicators where 1 indicator is imperfect and subject with very high belief can fulfill all the indicators of reasoning well and complete.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-07-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/24211</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): June 2018; 48-53</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/24211/11133</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>