Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability Viewed from Student Metacognition in Learning Cycle 5E Assisted by Learning Management System

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 88–101

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Terbit
2022-06-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to describe the ability to think creatively in terms of students' metacognition with the 5E learning cycle assisted by LMS. The research subjects were twelve students with the high metacognition, ten students with the medium metacogniton, and ten students with low metacognition. Methods of collecting data using observation techniques using questionnaires or metacognition questionnaires. Based on the results of this study indicate that subjects with a high metacognition category have good knowledge of understanding important information. On the other hand, the subject is conscientious, focused, and confident that the implementation of the strategy is effective in solving problems. Subjects understand well the questions and organize important information. The results of the work are systematic and correct, and the subject is also aware of errors in the work process. In contrast to the metacognitive category of subjects who currently have good knowledge. In addition, the subject is quite good at writing conclusions. Subjects still need to be careful in monitoring the results of their work. The subject is quite good at evaluating the results of his work. Meanwhile, subjects with low metacognition have sufficient knowledge in understanding information. The subject has difficulty managing his strategy well. In addition, the subject cannot justify the wrong answer and is not careful in monitoring the results of the answer. Subjects do an adequate assessment of the results of their work.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 172 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 7 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • University of Surabaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga17
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang8
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang5
Adi Nur CahyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang4
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang3
Dwijanto DwijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sugiman SugimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
BERNIKA RAHMANIA NALURITAAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Stevanus Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Heriyanto HeriyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aisyah Fany AchmaliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Endang Retno WinartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Dwi YantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Iwan JunaediState University of Semarang2
Winardi WinardiUniversity of Surabaya2
Tri WahyuningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurkaromah DwidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yodie Nur HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tri Sri Noor AsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hendi Widi PriyonggoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ignasia Santi Kumala SwariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nikmah NurvicalestiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Masjaya MasjayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sunarmi SunarmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Putriaji HendikawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indrati RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anita SulistyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muh. Fajar SafaatullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ayu AristikaState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability Viewed from Student Metacognition in Learning Cycle 5E Assisted by Learning Management System</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Firdaus, Anita Aulia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>wardono, Wardono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Walid, Walid</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to describe the ability to think creatively in terms of students' metacognition with the 5E learning cycle assisted by LMS. The research subjects were twelve students with the high metacognition, ten students with the medium metacogniton, and ten students with low metacognition. Methods of collecting data using observation techniques using questionnaires or metacognition questionnaires. Based on the results of this study indicate that subjects with a high metacognition category have good knowledge of understanding important information. On the other hand, the subject is conscientious, focused, and confident that the implementation of the strategy is effective in solving problems. Subjects understand well the questions and organize important information. The results of the work are systematic and correct, and the subject is also aware of errors in the work process. In contrast to the metacognitive category of subjects who currently have good knowledge. In addition, the subject is quite good at writing conclusions. Subjects still need to be careful in monitoring the results of their work. The subject is quite good at evaluating the results of his work. Meanwhile, subjects with low metacognition have sufficient knowledge in understanding information. The subject has difficulty managing his strategy well. In addition, the subject cannot justify the wrong answer and is not careful in monitoring the results of the answer. Subjects do an adequate assessment of the results of their work.
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/55344</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 11 No 1 (2022): June 2022; 88-101</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/55344/22242</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>