Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Mathematical Literacy Pattern Considered by Students’ Interests in ICARE Learning Through Smart Apps Creator with Performance Assessment

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 80–87

ISSN
2502-4507, 2252-6455
Terbit
2022-06-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to find patterns of mathematical literacy in terms of student interest in ICARE learning through smart apps creators with performance assessments. This type of research is a mixed-method explanatory type, with a quasi-experimental type of nonequivalent control group design. The research subjects were students of class IXF SMP 1 Jekulo. Methods of collecting data are obtained by observation, literacy tests, and interviews. Data analysis was based on 7 components of mathematical literacy, namely communication, mathematization, representation, reasoning, and argumentation, planning strategies, using symbolic, formal, and technical language as well as arithmetic operations, and using mathematical tools. The results of the study there were 3 different literacy patterns for high, medium, and low interest. The pattern of students' interest in learning is high, the average mastery of the minimum components is good: very good all components and good representation; four components are excellent and good for mathematization, representation and using tools; four components are very good and good for mathematizing, planning strategies, and representation. The average pattern of mastery of the components is minimal enough: good for all components except for sufficient mathematization; the second and third patterns are almost the same, namely all are good except that they use sufficient tools. Meanwhile, for the low-average pattern, there are less-criteria: all components are good except for using symbols and category tools enough; all components are minimal enough except for lack of mathematization; everything is minimal enough and less to use symbols.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 252 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Wardono WardonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui16
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang13
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang8
Rochmad RochmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Mohammad AsikinAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Isnarto IsnartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Supriyadi SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Tri Sri Noor AsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
St. Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang5
Hardi SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Kristina WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang4
Dwijanto DwijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Isti HidayahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang3
Zaenuri MasturAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Walid WalidState University of Semarang3
Adi Satrio ArdiansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ami AriyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suhito SuhitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Amin SuyitnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Endang Retno WinartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang3
Rahayu Budhiati VeronicaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Nuriana Rachmani DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Stevanus Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Batul Fatin HendrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Iqbal KharisudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hery SutartoState University of Semarang2
Edy SoedjokoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Literacy Pattern Considered by Students’ Interests in ICARE Learning Through Smart Apps Creator with Performance Assessment</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>., Rodhi Rodhi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Junaedi, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to find patterns of mathematical literacy in terms of student interest in ICARE learning through smart apps creators with performance assessments. This type of research is a mixed-method explanatory type, with a quasi-experimental type of nonequivalent control group design. The research subjects were students of class IXF SMP 1 Jekulo. Methods of collecting data are obtained by observation, literacy tests, and interviews. Data analysis was based on 7 components of mathematical literacy, namely communication, mathematization, representation, reasoning, and argumentation, planning strategies, using symbolic, formal, and technical language as well as arithmetic operations, and using mathematical tools. The results of the study there were 3 different literacy patterns for high, medium, and low interest. The pattern of students' interest in learning is high, the average mastery of the minimum components is good: very good all components and good representation; four components are excellent and good for mathematization, representation and using tools; four components are very good and good for mathematizing, planning strategies, and representation. The average pattern of mastery of the components is minimal enough: good for all components except for sufficient mathematization; the second and third patterns are almost the same, namely all are good except that they use sufficient tools. Meanwhile, for the low-average pattern, there are less-criteria: all components are good except for using symbols and category tools enough; all components are minimal enough except for lack of mathematization; everything is minimal enough and less to use symbols.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/56590</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research; Vol 11 No 1 (2022): June 2022; 80-87</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4507</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6455</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/56590/22030</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>