Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

the Developing Assessment Instrument In Critical Thinking Ability For Fifth Grade Of Elementary School In Thematic Learning

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019) · pp. 123–132

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i2.36685
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2019-08-23
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The background of this study is about the availibility of the test assessment instrument to measure the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students which is limitted. Therefore, it needs to be developed. This development research used the Borg & Gall development method. The purpose of this study was to develop an assessment instrument in essay. The assessment instrument was validated by 5 Experts Judgment by using the Aiken'V formula. The results of trials using the construct validity of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), interater reliability used Two Ways Anova proved by the Ebel formula and internal consistent reliability with the Alpha Cronbach formula. The result of expert judgment validation showed that ≥0.8 which mean that 10 items were in valid category, construct validity results from large-scale test analysis by using LISREL 8.8 namely Confirmatory Factor fulfilled the testing of goodness of fit GFI value 0,93, CFI=0,97 and NFI=0,91. The three assessment criteria have value > 0,90. It can be concluded that the construct validity is met. The construct validity is also evidenced by the loading factor of 10 items. All of which have a price of > 0,3. The interrater reliability assessment instruments based on Expert Judgment coefficient value was 0,62. The expert agreement indicated that the rating given by each rater is reliable or consistent between one another and internal consistency of small scale test results of coefficient value of alpha 0,861, large scale 0.813. Practicality of assessment instruments based on expert judgment had mean 37.2 and included in practical category. The profile of critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students category “Medium”. The Conclusions was the assessment instruments in critical thinking skills of fifth grade students on thematic learning were tested in validity, reliability and suitable to be used.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 252 co-authorship links · 19 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Widya Mataram Yogyakarta
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown17
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown9
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang9
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang8
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown8
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang7
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang7
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang7
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown7
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang7
Hartono HartonoAffiliation unknown6
Mulyono MulyonoAffiliation unknown6
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar6
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang6
Iwan JunaediState University of Semarang5
Tri Sri Noor AsihAffiliation unknown5
Budi AstutiAffiliation unknown5
Ellianawati EllianawatiState University of Semarang4
Kristina WijayantiAffiliation unknown4
Isnarto IsnartoAffiliation unknown4
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown4
Sarwi SarwiAffiliation unknown4
Isti HidayahAffiliation unknown4
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
. SupriyadiAffiliation unknown3
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang3
Mahardika Prasetya AjiAffiliation unknown3
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang3
Dwijanto DwijantoAffiliation unknown3
Zaenuri MasturAffiliation unknown3
Walid WalidState University of Semarang3
Ridho Adi NegoroAffiliation unknown3
Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown3
Ami AriyaniAffiliation unknown3
Sulhadi SulhadiAffiliation unknown3
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown3

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">the Developing Assessment Instrument In Critical Thinking Ability For Fifth Grade Of Elementary School In Thematic Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hartanto, Hartanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusilowati, Ani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The background of this study is about the availibility of the test assessment instrument to measure the critical thinking ability of fifth grade elementary school students which is limitted. Therefore, it needs to be developed. This development research used the Borg &amp;amp; Gall development method. The purpose of this study was to develop an assessment instrument in essay. The assessment instrument was validated by 5 Experts Judgment by using the Aiken'V formula. The results of trials using the construct validity of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), interater reliability used Two Ways Anova proved by the Ebel formula and internal consistent reliability with the Alpha Cronbach formula. The result of expert judgment validation showed that ≥0.8 which mean that 10 items were in valid category, construct validity results from large-scale test analysis by using LISREL 8.8 namely Confirmatory Factor fulfilled the testing of goodness of fit GFI value 0,93, CFI=0,97 and NFI=0,91. The three assessment criteria have value &amp;gt; 0,90. It can be concluded that the construct validity is met. The construct validity is also evidenced by the loading factor of 10 items. All of which have a price of &amp;gt; 0,3. The interrater reliability assessment instruments based on Expert Judgment coefficient value was 0,62. The expert agreement indicated that the rating given by each rater is reliable or consistent between one another and internal consistency of small scale test results of coefficient value of alpha 0,861, large scale 0.813. Practicality of assessment instruments based on expert judgment had mean 37.2 and included in practical category. The profile of critical thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students category “Medium”. The Conclusions was the assessment instruments in critical thinking skills of fifth grade students on thematic learning were tested in validity, reliability and suitable to be used.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-08-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/36685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i2.36685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 2 (2019); 123-132</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/36685/15165</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>