Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

PENGARUH SUBSTITUSI TEPUNG TALAS (Colocasia esculenta L.Schoott) TERHADAP NILAI SENSORIK DAN NILAI GIZI ROTI MANIS

Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan · Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018)

DOI
10.33772/jstp.v2i4.3569
ISSN
2527-6271
Published
2018-02-18
Publisher
JURUSAN ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PANGAN, UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO
Language
eng

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research aimed to study the effect of substitution of taro flour in the sweet bread making on the sensory properties of the bread and to determine the nutritional value of the panelist most preferred substituted bread. This study was prepared based on Completely Randomized Design (CRD). This study used five treatments consisting of R1 = wheat flour:taro flour (100%: 0%), R2 = wheat flour: taro flour = (95%: 5%), R3 = wheat flour: taro flour (90%: 10%), R4 = wheat flour:taro flour (85%: 15%) and R5 = wheat flour: taro flour (80%: 20%). The observed variables were organoleptic properties(color, texture, flavor and taste) and nutritional values (moisture content, ash content, fat content, protein content andcarbohydrate levels). The research showed that the sweet bread product preferred by panelists was treatment R5 that was80% wheat flour and taro flour 20% with score rating of likes to color equal to 3.71 (like), texture equal to 4.11 (like), aroma4.20 (like) and taste 4.21 (like). The nutritional value was 30.75 % moisture content, the ash content of 1.41 %, fat content of1.45 %, protein content of 3.20 % and carbohydrate content of 68.94 % dry basis. The results showed that the treatment ofsubstitution of taro flour significantly affected the organoleptic assessment and nutritional values of sweet bread. Based onthe result of this research, it can be concluded that the best treatment of substitution of taro flour in making sweet bread wasin the ratio of 20% taro flour and 80% wheat flour with the panelist organoleptic rating average of like.Keywords: sweet bread, taro flour, wheat flour ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perlakuan terbaik substitusi tepung talas pada pembuatan roti manis denganmemerhatikan nilai sensorik dan nilai gizi roti manis yang disukai oleh panelis. Penelitian ini disusun berdasarkanRancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL).Penelitian ini menggunakan lima perlakuan yang terdiri atas R1 = tepung terigu: tepungtalas (100%: 0%), R2 = tepung terigu: tepung talas = (95%: 5%), R3 = tepung terigu: tepung talas (90%: 10%), R4 =tepung terigu: tepung talas (85%: 15%) serta R5 = tepung terigu: tepung talas (80%: 20%). Parameter yang diamatiadalah penilaian organoleptik (warna, tekstur, aroma dan citarasa) analisis nilai gizi (kadar air, kadar abu, kadar lemak,kadar protein dan kadar karbohidrat) dilakukan pada produk hasil penilaian terbaik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwaproduk roti manis perlakuan terbaik yang disukai panelis terdapat pada perlakuan R5 yaitu komposisi tepung terigu 80% dantepung talas 20% dengan skor penilaian kesukaan terhadap warna sebesar 3,71 (suka), tekstur sebesar 4,11(suka), aromasebesar 4,20 (suka) dan rasa sebesar 4,21 (suka). Dengan nilai gizi yaitu kadar air sebesar 30,75%, kadar abu sebesar1,41%, kadar lemak sebesar 1,45%, kadar protein sebesar 3,20% dan kadar karbohidrat sebesar 68,94% basis kering.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan substitusi tepung talas berpengaruh nyata terhadap penilaian organoleptikdan nilai gizi roti manis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlakuan terbaik substitusi tepungtalas dan tepung terigu dalam pembuatan roti manis yakni pada perbandingan tepung talas 20% dan tepung terigu 80% dengan rerata penilaian organoleptik disukai panelis. Kata kunci: roti manis, tepung talas, tepung terigu.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 127 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nur AsyikUniversitas Halu Oleo18
RH Fitri FaradillaAffiliation unknown13
Muhammad Syukri SadimantaraUniversitas Halu Oleo12
Hermanto HermantoUniversitas Halu Oleo12
LA KARIMUNAUniversitas Halu Oleo11
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown9
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo8
Tamrin TamrinUniversitas Halu Oleo7
Djukrana WahabAffiliation unknown6
Asnani AsnaniAffiliation unknown3
Mariani. LAffiliation unknown3
La RiandaAffiliation unknown2
Andi WidyantiAffiliation unknown2
Agung Putu Agus SaputraAffiliation unknown2
Diah Islamyati HarsyamAffiliation unknown2
Kadir KadirAffiliation unknown2
Irmawati IrmawatiAffiliation unknown2
ADAM MALIKUniversitas Halu Oleo1
KHAIRUN NISAUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sakir SakirAffiliation unknown1
Sawalludin SawalludinAffiliation unknown1
SARAWA -Affiliation unknown1
Suwarjoyowirayatno SuwarjoyowirayatnoAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode SarinaAffiliation unknown1
Stefiana Yunisa LakawaAffiliation unknown1
Maysuci AyunirAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad DilaAffiliation unknown1
Andi HaerulAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode MeliAffiliation unknown1
Siti NgaropaAffiliation unknown1
Satria SatriaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad HasjalAffiliation unknown1
Sardin SardinAffiliation unknown1
Febriani SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Rana AulianaAffiliation unknown1
Samsia SamsiaAffiliation unknown1
Nurlin NurlinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/oai, first harvested 31 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGARUH SUBSTITUSI TEPUNG TALAS (Colocasia esculenta L.Schoott) TERHADAP NILAI SENSORIK DAN NILAI GIZI ROTI MANIS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Pratiwi, Ariana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ansharullah, Ansharullah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Baco, Abdu Rahman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">ABSTRACT  This research aimed to study the effect of substitution of taro flour in the sweet bread making on the sensory properties of the bread and to determine the nutritional value of the panelist most preferred substituted bread. This study was prepared based on Completely Randomized Design (CRD). This study used five treatments consisting of R1 = wheat flour:taro flour (100%: 0%), R2 = wheat flour: taro flour = (95%: 5%), R3 = wheat flour: taro flour (90%: 10%), R4 = wheat flour:taro flour (85%: 15%) and R5 = wheat flour: taro flour (80%: 20%). The observed variables were organoleptic properties(color, texture, flavor and taste) and nutritional values (moisture content, ash content, fat content, protein content andcarbohydrate levels). The research showed that the sweet bread product preferred by panelists was treatment R5 that was80%  wheat flour and taro flour 20% with score rating of likes to color equal to 3.71 (like), texture equal to 4.11 (like), aroma4.20 (like) and taste 4.21 (like). The nutritional value was 30.75 % moisture content, the ash content of 1.41 %, fat content of1.45 %, protein content of 3.20 % and carbohydrate content of 68.94 % dry basis. The results showed that the treatment ofsubstitution of taro flour significantly affected the organoleptic assessment and nutritional values of sweet bread. Based onthe result of this research, it can be concluded that the best treatment of substitution of taro flour in making sweet bread wasin the ratio of 20% taro flour and 80% wheat flour with the panelist organoleptic rating average of like.Keywords: sweet bread, taro flour, wheat flour ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perlakuan terbaik substitusi tepung talas pada pembuatan roti manis denganmemerhatikan nilai sensorik dan nilai gizi roti manis yang disukai oleh panelis. Penelitian ini disusun berdasarkanRancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL).Penelitian ini menggunakan lima perlakuan yang terdiri atas R1 = tepung terigu : tepungtalas (100% : 0%), R2 = tepung terigu : tepung talas = (95% : 5%), R3 = tepung terigu : tepung talas (90% : 10%), R4 =tepung terigu : tepung talas (85% : 15%) serta R5 = tepung terigu : tepung talas (80% : 20%). Parameter yang diamatiadalah penilaian organoleptik (warna, tekstur, aroma dan citarasa) analisis nilai gizi (kadar air, kadar abu, kadar lemak,kadar protein dan kadar karbohidrat) dilakukan pada produk hasil penilaian terbaik.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwaproduk roti manis perlakuan terbaik yang disukai panelis terdapat pada perlakuan R5 yaitu komposisi tepung terigu 80% dantepung talas 20% dengan skor penilaian kesukaan terhadap warna sebesar 3,71 (suka), tekstur sebesar 4,11(suka), aromasebesar 4,20 (suka) dan rasa sebesar 4,21 (suka). Dengan nilai gizi yaitu kadar air sebesar 30,75%, kadar abu sebesar1,41%, kadar lemak sebesar 1,45%, kadar protein sebesar 3,20% dan kadar karbohidrat sebesar  68,94% basis kering.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan substitusi tepung talas berpengaruh nyata terhadap penilaian organoleptikdan nilai gizi roti manis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlakuan terbaik substitusi tepungtalas dan tepung terigu dalam pembuatan roti manis yakni pada perbandingan tepung talas 20% dan tepung terigu 80% dengan rerata penilaian organoleptik disukai panelis.  Kata kunci: roti manis, tepung talas, tepung terigu.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">JURUSAN ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PANGAN, UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2018-02-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/article/view/3569</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/jstp.v2i4.3569</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan; Vol 2, No 4 (2017): JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI PANGAN</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2527-6271</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33772/jstp.v2i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/article/view/3569/2710</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>