Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

UJI ORGANOLEPTIK, FISIK DAN NILAI GIZI MIE BASAH BERBASIS TEPUNG UBI KAYU FERMENTASI (Manihot esculenta Crantz) DAN TEPUNG IKAN TERI (Stolephorus commersonii)

Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan · Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020)

DOI
10.33772/jstp.v5i3.13109
ISSN
2527-6271
Published
2020-07-26
Publisher
JURUSAN ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PANGAN, UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO
Language
eng

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis research aimed to study the effect of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour formulation on the organoleptic characteristics, physical characteristics, and nutritional value of wet noodles. This research used a completely randomized design with a formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour M1 (85:14,9:0,1), M2 (80:19,7:0,3), M3 (75:24,5:0,5), and M4 (70:29,3:0,7). The observed variables were organoleptic characteristics (color, aroma, taste, and texture), physical characteristics (water absorption, developing power, and breaking power) and nutritional value (water, ash, protein, fat, and fiber contents). Organoleptic assessment results were analyzed statistically using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results show that the formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour was highly significant (P 0.05) on the organoleptic color, aroma, taste, and texture. The most preferred wet noodles on the organoleptic test were the M1 formulation (85% wheat flour, 14,9% fermented cassava flour, and 0,1% anchovy flour) with organoleptic scores of color, aroma, taste, and texture reached 3.38 (slightly like), 3.37 (slightly like), flavor 3.25 (slightly like), and 3.00 (slightly like), respectively. The preferred wet noodle contained 11.44% water, 3.43% ash, 2.96% protein, 3.09% fat, and 12.25% crude fiber. It can be concluded that the wet noodle product formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour can be accepted (like) by the panelists but the protein and water contents did not meet the national standard.Keywords: wet noodle, fermented wood cassava flour, anchovy flourABSTRAKTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari pengaruh formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri terhadap karakteristik organoleptik, fisik dan nilai gizi mie basah. Penelitian ini menggunakan Rancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL) dengan menggunakan formulasi tepung terigu, tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri M1 (85:14,9:0,1), M2 (80:19,7:0,3), M3 (75:24,5:0,5), M4 (70:29,3:0,7). Variabel pengamatan pada penelitian ini yaitu karakteristik organoleptik (warna, aroma, rasa dan tekstur), karakteristik fisik (daya serap air, daya kembang dan daya putus) dan nilai gizi (kadar air, kadar abu, kadar protein, kadar lemak dan kadar serat). Data hasil penilaian organoleptik dianalisis secara statistik menggunakan Analysis of Varians (ANOVA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri berpengaruh sangat nyata (P0,05) terhadap uji organoleptik warna, aroma, rasa dan tekstur. Mie basah terpilih berdasarkan penilaian organoleptik terdapat pada formulasi M1 (formulasi tepung terigu 85%, tepung ubi kayu fermentasi 14,9%, dan tepung ikan teri 0,1%) dengan skor penilaian terhadap karakteristik organoleptik warna 3,38 (agak suka), aroma 3,37 (agak suka), rasa 3,25 (agak suka) dan tekstur 3,00 (agak suka). Nilai gizi dari produk mie basah terbaik meliputi: kadar air 11,44%, kadar abu 3,43%, kadar protein 2,96%, kadar lemak 3,09% dan kadar serat kasar 12,25%. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, produk mie basah formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri dapat diterima (disukai) oleh panelis dan memiliki kadar protein dan kadar air yang belum memenuhi standar SNI.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 130 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hermanto HermantoUniversitas Halu Oleo18
Suwarjoyowirayatno SuwarjoyowirayatnoAffiliation unknown18
Nur AsyikUniversitas Halu Oleo13
Asnani AsnaniAffiliation unknown7
RH Fitri FaradillaAffiliation unknown7
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo6
Djukrana WahabAffiliation unknown5
Mohammad Nuh IbrahimAffiliation unknown5
Ansharullah AnsharullahUniversitas Halu Oleo5
Andi Besse PatadjaiAffiliation unknown4
LA KARIMUNAUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Mohamad Nuh IbrahimAffiliation unknown3
Moh. Nuh IbrahimAffiliation unknown3
Abdu Rahman BacoAffiliation unknown3
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown3
Muhammad Syukri SadimantaraUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Nur illiyin AkibAffiliation unknown2
Ari SartinahUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Mariani. LAffiliation unknown2
Ryan HidayatAffiliation unknown2
Rimba HamidUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Amiruddin BAffiliation unknown1
GEDE AGUS SANJAYAUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Azhar BafadalUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Anugrah HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Sarinah SarinahAffiliation unknown1
I Gede MardiantaAffiliation unknown1
La Ode MuharamAffiliation unknown1
Salam SalamAffiliation unknown1
Farida FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Nita Pratiwi IdhamAffiliation unknown1
Asman AsmanAffiliation unknown1
Anita Komala SariAffiliation unknown1
Muh Alsere Bardian SahabaAffiliation unknown1
Selin LolopayungAffiliation unknown1
Fajrin AssidikAffiliation unknown1
Erma YunikaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/oai, first harvested 31 Okt 2026, last seen 31 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">UJI ORGANOLEPTIK, FISIK DAN NILAI GIZI MIE BASAH BERBASIS TEPUNG UBI KAYU FERMENTASI (Manihot esculenta Crantz) DAN TEPUNG IKAN TERI (Stolephorus commersonii)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Maharani, Maharani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Tamrin, Tamrin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Isamu, Kobajashi Togo</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">ABSTRACTThis research aimed to study the effect of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour formulation on the organoleptic characteristics, physical characteristics, and nutritional value of wet noodles. This research used a completely randomized design with a formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour M1 (85:14,9:0,1), M2 (80:19,7:0,3), M3 (75:24,5:0,5), and M4 (70:29,3:0,7). The observed variables were organoleptic characteristics (color, aroma, taste, and texture), physical characteristics (water absorption, developing power, and breaking power) and nutritional value (water, ash, protein, fat, and fiber contents). Organoleptic assessment results were analyzed statistically using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results show that the formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour was highly significant (P 0.05) on the organoleptic color, aroma, taste, and texture. The most preferred wet noodles on the organoleptic test were the M1 formulation (85% wheat flour, 14,9% fermented cassava flour, and 0,1% anchovy flour) with organoleptic scores of color, aroma, taste, and texture reached 3.38 (slightly like), 3.37 (slightly like), flavor 3.25 (slightly like), and 3.00 (slightly like), respectively. The preferred wet noodle contained 11.44% water, 3.43% ash, 2.96% protein, 3.09% fat, and 12.25% crude fiber. It can be concluded that the wet noodle product formulation of fermented cassava flour and anchovy flour can be accepted (like) by the panelists but the protein and water contents did not meet the national standard.Keywords: wet noodle, fermented wood cassava flour, anchovy flourABSTRAKTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari pengaruh formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri terhadap karakteristik organoleptik, fisik dan nilai gizi mie basah. Penelitian ini menggunakan Rancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL) dengan menggunakan formulasi tepung terigu, tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri M1 (85:14,9:0,1), M2 (80:19,7:0,3), M3 (75:24,5:0,5), M4 (70:29,3:0,7). Variabel pengamatan pada penelitian ini yaitu karakteristik organoleptik (warna, aroma, rasa dan tekstur), karakteristik fisik (daya serap air, daya kembang dan daya putus) dan nilai gizi (kadar air, kadar abu, kadar protein, kadar lemak dan kadar serat). Data hasil penilaian organoleptik dianalisis secara statistik menggunakan Analysis of Varians (ANOVA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri berpengaruh sangat nyata (P0,05) terhadap uji organoleptik warna, aroma, rasa dan tekstur. Mie basah terpilih berdasarkan penilaian organoleptik terdapat pada formulasi M1 (formulasi tepung terigu 85%, tepung ubi kayu fermentasi 14,9%, dan tepung ikan teri 0,1%) dengan skor penilaian terhadap karakteristik organoleptik warna 3,38 (agak suka), aroma 3,37 (agak suka), rasa 3,25 (agak suka) dan tekstur 3,00 (agak suka). Nilai gizi dari produk mie basah terbaik meliputi: kadar air 11,44%, kadar abu 3,43%, kadar protein 2,96%, kadar lemak 3,09% dan kadar serat kasar 12,25%. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, produk mie basah formulasi tepung ubi kayu fermentasi dan tepung ikan teri dapat diterima (disukai) oleh panelis dan memiliki kadar protein dan kadar air yang belum memenuhi standar SNI.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">JURUSAN ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PANGAN, UNIVERSITAS HALU OLEO</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2020-07-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/article/view/13109</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/jstp.v5i3.13109</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan; Vol 5, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2527-6271</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33772/jstp.v5i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jstp/article/view/13109/9090</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Pangan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>